The reason God's covenants with Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David ought to increase the joy of our faith is that in all of them the main point is that God exerts all his omnipotence and all his omniscience to do good to his people, and we are that people if we follow Christ in the obedience of faith. The most practical truths any Christian can know are that God is all-powerful, all-wise, and all for you. Nothing will have a more important practical impact on the way you use your money, spend your leisure, pursue your vocation, rear children, deal with conflict, or handle anxiety. Heartfelt confidence that the sovereign God is working everything together for your good out of sheer grace affects every area of your life.
The deep emotional assurance that, even though you are a sinner, God's attention is focused on you with omnipotent mercy is the day-to-day power to give you deep peace even though you can't go home for Christmas, genuine joy even though you can't afford to buy her that special gift, and loving warmth even though you don't hear from the friend you counted on. When you rest in the fact that God's job description includes the responsibility of seeing that everything in your life turns out for your good, then your heart will not yield to covetousness or stealing or returning ridicule for ridicule; and you won't hold back from telling your colleagues this week what Christmas really means to you.
The reason we study the covenants is because in them we see the biblical proof that God's job description does indeed include the responsibility to withhold no good thing from those who walk uprightly, and to work for those who wait for him, and to turn every strep throat and stripped clutch and stinging put-down for our eternal good. That's what I would offer as the definition of God's covenants: when God makes a covenant he reveals his own job description and signs it. In almost every case he comes to the covenant partner, lays his job description out and says, "This is how I will work for you with all my heart and with all my soul and with all my strength if you will love me as I am, cleave to me, and trust me to keep my word."
You can read or listen to the full sermon here.
Also during his lesson, Rocky briefly touched on something that reminded me of something I had once heard from Piper. Rocky said something about how a truly benevolent dictatorship would be the best form of government, as long as we could find the right king. Well, by God's grace, we have just that king - King Jesus. Which reminded me of the following, which comes from another Christmas sermon from John Piper, this one on Christmas Day, 2005:
Let’s start with the controversial fact that the person who came of this in-breaking of God is a king. Luke 1:32b-33 says, “The Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, 33 and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Three words tell us that this person will be a king: “Throne”—“The Lord will give to him the throne of his father David; “Reign”—“And he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever;” “Kingdom”—“And of his kingdom there will be no end.”
What makes this controversial is that we believe in democracy, not kingdoms. Saudi Arabia is not an attractive system to us. Democracy is what the world is moving toward. It’s what we are fighting for in Iraq. Rule by a king was a more primitive form of government, wasn’t it? Democracies are more advanced, more developed, more suitable for the modern world. This is where history is going—democracy, not kingdom.
Let me respond to this very soberly and very simply: the only legitimate reason that kingship is not attractive to us is because in this age and this world the only kings available are finite and sinful. Listen to C. S. Lewis describe why he believes in democracy:
A great deal of democratic enthusiasm descends from the ideas of people like Rousseau, who believed in democracy because they thought mankind so wise and good that everyone deserved a share in the government. The danger of defending democracy on those grounds is that they’re not true. . . I find that they’re not true without looking further than myself. I don’t deserve a share in governing a hen-roost, much less a nation. . . . The real reason for democracy is . . . Mankind is so fallen that no man can be trusted with unchecked power over his fellows. Aristotle said that some people were only fit to be slaves. I do not contradict him. But I reject slavery because I see no men fit to be masters. [from C. S. Lewis, “Equality,” in Present Concerns: Essays by C. S. Lewis, qtd. in Wayne Martindale and Jerry Root, eds., The Quotable C. S. Lewis (Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 1989), pp. 152-153.]
If there could be a king who is not limited in his wisdom and power and goodness and love for his subjects, then monarchy would be the best of all governments. If such a ruler could ever rise in the world—with no weakness, no folly, no sin—then no wise and humble person would ever want democracy again.
The question is not whether God broke into the universe as a king. He did. The question is: What kind of king is he? What difference would his kingship make for you?
Read, listen to, or watch the full sermon here.